🔍 Read the full analysis: Meta And TikTok Back Google’s Push Against Indonesia’s AI Bill on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
Meta and TikTok joined Google at a Nov. 11 parliamentary hearing to oppose parts of Indonesia’s draft copyright-law revision, including possible payments for displaying news links and proposed AI rules. The bill is still under deliberation, its current text was not available, and no vote date has been announced.
Meta and TikTok joined Google in challenging parts of Indonesia’s proposed copyright-law revision at a parliamentary hearing in Jakarta on Nov. 11, as lawmakers consider rules that could require platforms to pay for displaying news and set terms for artificial intelligence training. The proposal remains a draft under deliberation; a vote date has not been announced.
The revision would amend Indonesia’s Copyright Law, Law No. 28 of 2014. Parliament approved it as an initiative in a plenary session on March 12, 2026, and its Legislation Body, known as Baleg, is now discussing it with the government. On Nov. 11, Baleg heard representatives from Google, Meta and TikTok, as well as the Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia, according to Kompas.
The bill’s current text was not available to the source publication. Details in public reporting rely in part on a July draft described by Reuters, and accounts of the version discussed in November cite differing provisions. That July draft proposed compensation for platforms’ aggregation, republication or link previews of news, and for using news content to train AI. It also included possible sanctions for noncompliance, according to Reuters. Those details should not be treated as settled provisions in the current draft.
At the hearing, Google objected to payment requirements for news links and snippets, a single collective licensing body, and mandatory licenses for AI training data, according to reports by Suara and Kompas. Meta argued that sharing a link is not the same as republishing a publisher’s work and said payment duties could reduce publishers’ traffic and revenue. TikTok said disclosure rules should not cover cases where AI merely assists with content creation, and argued that platforms should retain safe-harbor protections, according to the source material.
Platforms challenge Indonesia’s draft AI bill
Meta and TikTok joined Google in opposing parts of a proposed copyright revision. Its current text is unavailable, and lawmakers have not announced a vote date.
What platforms oppose
The companies raised concerns about how the proposal could affect news distribution and AI development.
Payment requirements
Google objected to fees for links and snippets. Meta said link sharing is not republication and could affect publishers’ traffic and revenue.
Licensing and disclosure
Google challenged mandatory training licenses. TikTok said disclosure rules should not cover AI that merely assists content creation.
Publishers’ concerns
The Press Council presented figures on platform advertising and news referrals at the hearing.
What remains unsettled
The available reporting does not establish the exact terms lawmakers are considering.
Baleg is discussing the revision with the government; the current text was not available to the reporting outlet.
Some details come from a July draft, and reports cite differing provisions for the November discussions.
The next public milestone is a further legislative discussion or a vote timetable announcement.
News Links and AI Training at Stake
The proposed rules could affect how news reaches Indonesian readers and how publishers are paid when platforms display or distribute their material. Google’s representative warned that a levy on links could leave the company with “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news, Reuters reported. That is the company’s stated position, not a confirmed outcome of the bill.
The dispute also touches the cost and availability of material used to train AI systems. Google says licensing every item used for training would be technically unworkable at web scale and proposes a text-and-data-mining exception with an opt-out mechanism such as robots.txt. The competing concern, reflected in the draft’s reported approach, is how creators and rights holders can control or receive compensation for use of their work.
Publishers and platforms describe the economic effects differently. Dewan Pers deputy chair Totok Suryanto told lawmakers that platforms take 80 percent of digital advertising and that traffic from platforms to news sites has fallen by up to 70 percent, according to the source material. Those figures were presented by the Press Council; the material does not provide a measurement period or methodology. The outcome could shape the balance between platform distribution, publisher income and access to information, but the draft’s final terms are not yet known.
Popular right now
Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation, Bluetooth 5.3, USB-C Charging, and IPX4 Water Resistance
De'Longhi Magnifica Duo Fully Automatic Espresso Machine with Milk Frother, Silver
Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Copyright Revision Still in Draft
Indonesia already has a policy requiring digital platforms to support quality journalism. Presidential Regulation No. 32 of 2024 established that requirement. At the November hearing, Suryanto said the regulation had not worked as intended and platform compliance was low, according to Aktual. The draft copyright revision would add a legislative framework, but its eventual relationship to the existing regulation remains unclear.
Reuters reported on the AI provisions in a July version of the bill, citing a draft authenticated by Hermansyah Siregar, a law ministry official overseeing intellectual property. Siregar said at the time that the proposal would mark the first explicit recognition of AI in Indonesia’s copyright law, while stressing that the draft was not final. The reported text addressed AI imitation of a creator’s distinctive style, disclosure of AI use, protection for AI-assisted works, and whether copyrighted works could be used for training under fair use or licensing.
The July draft reportedly distinguished AI-assisted works from fully AI-generated ones, but did not define how much human involvement would qualify. It also raised questions about whether platforms could be held responsible for material posted by users. Google has argued that intermediaries need safe-harbor protection and a notice-and-action process rather than being expected to decide copyright disputes themselves.
“A levy on links would leave Google “no choice” but to stop crawling, indexing and distributing Indonesian news.”
— Google representative Agung Pamungkas, as reported by Reuters
Key Provisions Remain Unsettled
The current draft has not been independently reviewed in the source material, and its text was not available to the reporting outlet. The bill has changed since July, while reports cite different versions. As a result, the exact scope of proposed payments, AI-training rules, disclosure duties and platform sanctions remains uncertain. References in hearing coverage to particular article numbers should be treated as provisional.
It is also unclear whether lawmakers will adopt the companies’ proposals on safe harbor, voluntary licensing or text-and-data mining, or how they will respond to publishers’ concerns about revenue and traffic. The draft’s reported AI provisions do not settle how much human contribution would qualify for copyright protection, or how any AI-use disclosure requirement would be applied. No parliamentary vote date has been announced.
Lawmakers Continue Draft Deliberations
Baleg is expected to continue discussing the revision with the government after hearing from technology companies and press organizations. The next publicly reported milestone would be a further legislative discussion or the announcement of a vote timetable, but no date has been disclosed. Any final text could differ from both the July version described by Reuters and the provisions discussed at the November hearing.
Until lawmakers publish or otherwise make the current draft available, readers and affected organizations cannot confirm the precise obligations being considered. The next version of the bill, and any accompanying explanation from parliament or the government, will clarify whether the proposal retains payments for news links, how it treats AI training, and what protections apply to platforms and rights holders.
Key Questions
What happened at the Nov. 11 hearing?
Google, Meta and TikTok raised objections to parts of Indonesia’s draft copyright-law revision before parliament’s Legislation Body. The Press Council and Satu Lisensi Indonesia also attended, according to Kompas.
Is the proposed copyright revision now law?
No. The bill is still under deliberation by Baleg and the government. The source material reports no vote date.
What rules for news and AI have been reported?
A July draft reported by Reuters proposed compensation for certain uses of news, including aggregation and link previews, and addressed AI training, disclosure and creator rights. The current draft may differ, and its full text was not available to the reporting outlet.
Why does Google oppose the proposal?
Google argues that charging for links could limit news access and that requiring licenses for all AI training data would be unworkable at web scale. It has proposed a text-and-data-mining exception with an opt-out, according to hearing reports.
When will parliament vote?
No vote date has been announced in the source material. Baleg and the government are still discussing the draft.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
