🔍 Read the full analysis: Are AI Investors Getting Cold Feet Or Raising Their Standards? on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
The Financial Times and CNBC reported that OpenAI reduced its fundraising target from as much as $30 billion to about $20 billion; the round is still in progress, and the company has not commented. The Wall Street Journal separately reported that about $11 billion has been secured so far, a figure not independently confirmed in the source material. S&P affirmed Meta’s AA- credit rating but changed its outlook to negative, citing concerns about returns on AI investment.
OpenAI has reportedly cut its fundraising target from as much as $30 billion to about $20 billion, while S&P Global Ratings changed its outlook on Meta to negative because of its AI spending. The developments, reported on October 30 and 31, point to closer scrutiny of the cost and expected returns of AI investment, but do not establish that funding for the industry is running out.
The Financial Times reported October 30 that OpenAI lowered its target by $10 billion, to about $20 billion, citing people familiar with the matter. CNBC said the next day that it had independently confirmed the $20 billion target with a person familiar with the deal. CNBC’s source said the round was still in progress and its figures could change. OpenAI had not publicly commented on the fundraising as of October 31, according to the source material.
The FT and CNBC put OpenAI’s valuation at $1.25 trillion, down from $1.4 trillion initially floated. The FT also reported that a UAE investor consortium including state-backed MGX was expected to be the largest participant, and that OpenAI could have an option to lease computing capacity in the region. Founders Fund, Coatue, Sequoia Capital and Andreessen Horowitz were also reported as expected participants. These are reported plans, not announced commitments.
A separate Wall Street Journal report put the amount raised so far at about $11 billion and described the response from some large investors as “tepid.” The source material identifies no independent confirmation of that amount. On October 30, S&P affirmed Meta’s AA- credit rating but changed its outlook from stable to negative. S&P said Meta’s ability to monetize AI investments was more limited than that of some peers; Meta said it “respectfully” disagreed.
Infographic 01 · Confirmed or only reported
What we know about OpenAI’s shrinking round
Every number in this story comes from reporting, not from OpenAI. Here is which claim rests on how many sources.
- Target cut by $10B to about $20BTwo outlets
FT, citing people with knowledge of the matter; CNBC confirmed the figure with its own source. Round still open.
- Valuation $1.25T, down from $1.4TTwo outlets
FT and CNBC. Before or after the new money? The two CNBC reports differ.
- Friday deadline, first close below $20BOne outlet
FT. A later offering to wealthy individuals could fill the gap.
- UAE group with MGX expected to lead, option to lease computing capacityOne outlet
FT. CNBC had reported UAE investors and Coatue as leads on 22 Oct.
- About $11B secured, “tepid” response from some big investorsOne outlet
Wall Street Journal. Repeated by others, confirmed by none.
- OpenAINo comment
No reply to Reuters, CNBC or TechCrunch. No statement on its website.
How the round shrank
- 31 Mar 2026$122B closed at an $852B valuationOpenAI’s own announcement
- 22 Oct 2026Up to $30B at $1.25T, before new moneyCNBC, people familiar with the deal
- 30 Oct 2026Target cut to about $20BFT, relayed by Reuters
- 30 Oct 2026About $11B collected so farWall Street Journal
- 31 Oct 2026$20B confirmed, round not closedCNBC
“Two outlets” means two news organizations reported it with their own sources. None of this is confirmed by OpenAI.
Sources: FT via Reuters, 30 Oct 2026, CNBC, 31 Oct 2026, CNBC, 22 Oct 2026, WSJ as reported by Investing.com, 31 Oct 2026, OpenAI, 31 Mar 2026.
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
Investors Are Testing AI Returns
The two developments matter because AI companies are committing large sums to computing infrastructure before the financial returns are fully established. OpenAI’s reported target reduction may indicate that investors are negotiating the size, price or terms of a deal more closely. But the fundraising is ongoing, and a lower target alone does not show that the company cannot attract capital.
Meta’s rating outlook is a separate signal about the financial pressure of investment. S&P did not lower Meta’s AA- rating; it kept the rating while warning about the outlook and the company’s ability to turn AI spending into revenue. Meta’s disagreement also makes clear that the assessment is S&P’s judgment, not an uncontested finding.
For companies buying AI services, the practical concern is less an immediate shutdown than possible changes to prices, access limits and contract terms if providers face higher costs or seek better margins. Buyers may want to treat AI suppliers as critical vendors, review contract flexibility and maintain alternatives. Those are prudent responses to uncertainty, not evidence of an imminent service disruption.
Popular right now
Breville Bambino Espresso Machine, Brushed Stainless Steel (BES450BSS)
Samsung 85-Inch QN70H Neo QLED 4K Smart TV (2026)
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
A Large Raise, With Larger Bills
The reported target needs to be set against OpenAI’s recent financing. On March 31, OpenAI said it had closed $122 billion in committed capital at a post-money valuation of $852 billion. The company also said it had expanded an undrawn credit line to about $4.7 billion. That prior round makes an $11 billion reported amount look modest by comparison, but it does not by itself show whether the new round is succeeding or failing.
The company’s reported spending needs help explain why it may seek further financing. CNBC reported in October that OpenAI had told investors in February it was targeting about $600 billion in total computing spend by 2030. CNBC also characterized the fundraising as an “opportunistic” bridge ahead of a possible public listing. These figures and descriptions come from reporting; they are not a final account of OpenAI’s future spending or listing plans.
Meta’s figures show a different part of the same cost question. According to the source material, the company reported negative free cash flow of $2.1 billion in the third quarter, compared with positive $10.6 billion a year earlier, while guiding to $135 billion to $145 billion in capital spending for the year. These company financial figures provide context for S&P’s outlook change, but do not establish that AI spending alone caused the cash-flow shift.
“Meta’s “ability to monetize its AI investments is more limited than that of its peers.””
— S&P Global Ratings
Round Size and Terms Remain Open
OpenAI has not announced the round’s final size, valuation or investor list. The reported $20 billion target was confirmed by the FT and CNBC, but CNBC said the fundraising was still in progress and figures could change. The Journal’s roughly $11 billion figure has only one reporting source identified here, so it should not be treated as a confirmed close.
The valuation reporting also leaves a discrepancy in how the figure is described. The source material says CNBC described $1.25 trillion on October 22 as a pre-money valuation, while its October 31 report cited the FT describing that value as post-money. If both descriptions are accurate, the price per share may have moved, but that is an inference rather than a confirmed term of the deal.
It is also not clear whether the reported investor commitments will be completed, what the final allocation will be, or whether the possible computing-capacity arrangement with UAE investors will form part of the final deal. The reporting does not establish that investors are broadly withdrawing from AI, or that either OpenAI or Meta faces an immediate funding or service crisis.
Final Commitments Will Clarify the Deal
The immediate milestone is the completion of OpenAI’s fundraising round. The FT reported that the company gave investors until October 30 to commit and expected a first close below $20 billion, with a later offer to wealthy individuals potentially filling a gap. Those details remain attributed to the FT; the round was still underway in CNBC’s October 31 account.
More clarity should come from a final closing announcement or further reporting on the amount raised, valuation and participating investors. Any confirmed terms would help distinguish a lower target from a shortfall in commitments and clarify whether the reported regional computing option is included.
For Meta, the next relevant developments are S&P’s later rating reviews and the company’s financial updates, including whether spending and cash flow change and whether AI products generate revenue at a pace investors find persuasive. Until then, the outlook change is a warning about risk, not a credit-rating downgrade.
Key Questions
Did OpenAI officially confirm that it cut its fundraising target?
No. The Financial Times reported the reduction, and CNBC said it independently confirmed a target of about $20 billion. The source material says OpenAI had not commented and the round remained in progress.
Has OpenAI raised $11 billion in the round?
The Wall Street Journal reported that OpenAI had secured about $11 billion so far. The source material identifies no independent confirmation of that figure, so it remains a reported amount rather than a confirmed final total.
Did S&P downgrade Meta?
No. S&P affirmed Meta’s AA- rating but changed its outlook from stable to negative, citing concerns about the company’s ability to monetize AI investment.
Do these reports mean AI funding is drying up?
They do not establish that. They indicate more scrutiny around a major fundraising round and the cost and returns of AI spending. OpenAI’s round was still open, and the reported figures do not show an industry-wide funding collapse.
What should businesses using AI providers watch?
Businesses can track provider pricing, service limits, contract terms and financial updates. Maintaining alternative suppliers or internal fallback plans may reduce dependence on a single provider, but the reports do not indicate an imminent interruption of AI services.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
